| You act as if i am trying to get over on someone, is it the little green N? Honestly, this is what did it for me: 
Are you just jealous that someone can compete on a higher level than basic upgrades? Compete? I'm a little confused about this one, what competition are we talking about here? I suppose if this was a "Spending Money on Depreciating Assets" Competition, you'd be in the lead. Congratulations =). When we're doing with this, can we have a 401k competition and maybe a home-equity contest as well? I am only new to this site.... i have built all types of cars from the 99 cadillac on my site to a 600 Flywheel HP dyno proven pontiac 455 Trans Am. Unless you used an engine dyno, that's a blatant lie. Now we're starting to see why I recommend not using fliewheel horsepower. People (like you) apply arbitrarily high correction factors in an effort to inflate their horsepower numbers for bragging rights. It's a bastardization of a technically significant number, and there is absolutely no value in it. It serves only to confuse and annoy those who are trying to understand engine dynamics. This is my first Z and i have learned a great bit from the short time on this site, however this is not "Your" site. Yes, it is. Your unseen rule's apply to yourself, Do not bother me with your arrogance. Irony 1: You're bragging about your Trans-Am above.
Irony 2: You're telling me I can't "compete" with your ability to blow money on cars. Then you call me arrogant =). I recommend you use actual rwhp numbers because they're less prone to arbitrary inflation for the sake of ego stroking - just like you did above (thanks for the wicked good example!).
Recursively Yours,
Kenny...
PETZ Member #5
You guys rock socks. (Click for pie-chart)
Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes.
- EW Dijkstra
|
Relax vagina lips. - 
13:41:21 07/30/07
